Are you still posting that nonscense? evidentually you are....shakes head.....
It must be getting late or I’m getting tired.....
Are you still posting that nonsense? Evidently you are....shakes head.....
There, that’s better!
The ‘nonsense’ I posted has carried the day every time it has been put before a court.
At this point, the only way I know of to challenge it legally would be for a state government to require candidates for President to have been born of two US citizens, and thus give legal status to the birther definition of natural born citizen.
The moment a state does that, the Democrats would HAVE to sue and I see no way for the SCOTUS to avoid the case or issue a formal, written ruling on what “natural born citizen” means. And I strongly suspect they would rule in the democrats’ favor.
There is a reason no member of Congress dissented from certifying the election. There is a reason Rush, Coulter, Malkin and others refuse to support birthers - and it ISN’T because Rush & Coulter are traitors to their country! And yes, there is a reason why neither Arizona nor Utah nor any other reasonably conservative state has passed a birther bill for ballot access.
I personally agree with the birther definition of NBC, and I disagree with the concept of anchor babies. But I neither make the laws nor set the definitions...