Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Indian Navy gets 'invisible’ ship and added firepower
MSN.com ^ | 4/29/2010 | R Shankar

Posted on 04/29/2010 10:04:51 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld

India added new fire power and muscle to its Navy when Defence Minister A K Antony formally launched 'Shivalik' -- the S-class Frigate -- at the Mazagon Dock on Thursday. The Shivalik is a multirole stealth ship incorporating advanced signature suppression and signature management features along with both air defence and anti-sub marine capabilities. Though the ship is not completely invisible, it would be hard to detect on the high seas.

Armed with surface-to-surface and surface-to-air missiles, Shivalik carries two advanced helicopters and is equipped with state-of-the-art CODOG (Combined Diesel or Gas Turbine) propulsion system along with most of comprehensive innovative features.

Shivalik marks another move in securing India's sea lanes, according to Mazagon Docks, which built the ship.

With this, India has four stealth frigates. The last one to be launched was 'Sahayadri' - the 26th warship of the Indian Navy. Once the stealth frigates are commissioned, the focus will be on stealth submarines.

Essentially, the stealth ships hoodwink the radars. Though not completely foolproof, the Swedish Navy currently has what is believed to be the most "invisible" ship yet. Reports also indicate that the Royal Navy of the UK and the US Navy are actively involved in developing futuristic ships that are almost invisible in the high seas.

Already advanced countries have "stealth" aircraft. The first one was the F117; then came the B-2 bomber, in the 1980s.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.in.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: frigate; indiannavy; insshivalik; invisible; stealth; stealthship

1 posted on 04/29/2010 10:04:52 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

hmm...I can see it, hope they kept their receipt


2 posted on 04/29/2010 10:15:55 PM PDT by FightforFreedomCA (Pelosi is a wretched, communist, b!#*&)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FightforFreedomCA

Haha, when did a news reporter ever know anything about defence reporting? A la Geraldo Rat-tat-tat Rivera..


3 posted on 04/29/2010 10:16:39 PM PDT by ketelone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FightforFreedomCA
hmm...I can see it, hope they kept their receipt

It is good to see India building their own warships instead of buying more naval boats from Russia. It seems they are playing both sides, as they lose confidence in the USA for building up the Pakistani military.
4 posted on 04/29/2010 10:22:56 PM PDT by ATX 1985 (Time is Breath, Breath is Light, Light is Life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

When you have invisible ships it’s easy to overstate your fleet size. They should go whole hog and get some invisible airplanes and invisible missiles too.


5 posted on 04/29/2010 10:35:04 PM PDT by TigersEye (0basma's father was a British subject. He can't be a "natural-born" citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
I don't know how you go about making stealth ships. I know they tried it when stealth technology was invented but soon discover the flaw in the idea of stealth sea vessels.

This is what I recall the problem was. Unlike air, water is detectable on radar. A stealth ship leaves a big blank spot on the radar. It makes itself known by what doesn't appear on the radar screen.
6 posted on 04/29/2010 11:35:55 PM PDT by redheadtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redheadtoo

This is what I recall the problem was. Unlike air, water is detectable on radar. A stealth ship leaves a big blank spot on the radar. It makes itself known by what doesn’t appear on the radar screen.

****************************

Shhhh! You’re ruining it!


7 posted on 04/30/2010 12:00:51 AM PDT by ROTB (Without a Christian revival, we are government slaves, or attacked from outside during armed revolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
Indian Navy gets 'invisible’ ship made entirely of glass open for public tours but nobody can find it
8 posted on 04/30/2010 12:20:34 AM PDT by bunkerhill7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redheadtoo

Ship leaves a wake...


9 posted on 04/30/2010 1:11:56 AM PDT by donmeaker (Invicto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

A “modern” navy is nice, but what India really needs to worry about is roughly four million Chinese troops rolling over their northeastern border.


10 posted on 04/30/2010 1:28:09 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

I think the article title is misleading -— the system involved is likely the Israeli Barak-8 missile interceptor -— “whose radar provides 360-degree coverage against incoming missiles or air attack, and which was developed in partnership with India... all-weather, day-and-night, 360 degrees coverage and is capable of intercepting incoming missiles when they are no more than 500 meters away from target.”


11 posted on 04/30/2010 3:21:36 PM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine .. now it is your turn..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

The Himalayas tends to put a stop to that. Which is why most of India’s tanks are not facing China.


12 posted on 05/04/2010 1:48:21 AM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz

“The Himalayas tends to put a stop to that. Which is why most of India’s tanks are not facing China.”

The “Himalayas” didn’t even slow the Chinese down in 1962, when they attacked along the frontier of Arunachal Pradesh, routing the Indian army.

If the Chinese ever take it into their heads to invade India to acquire a fair-sized bit of additional lebensraum, there won’t be much to stop them. And that means the Himalayas, too.


13 posted on 05/04/2010 12:39:36 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

> invade India

Like in 1962 they could probably reach Calcutta and the Bay of Bengal real easily if they chose to.

Question is why would they? :>>

Even they don’t want to deal with West Bengal Communists!


14 posted on 05/04/2010 12:43:16 PM PDT by swarthyguy (KIDS! Deficit, Debt,Taxes!Pfft Lookit the bright side of our legacy -Ummrika is almost SmokFrei!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy

“Even they don’t want to deal with West Bengal Communists!”

Very droll; however, if China should take it into her collective head to invade India, there wouldn’t be a whole lot to stop them. And that means all the way down to the Palk Straight.


15 posted on 05/04/2010 1:09:16 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

The Indian military and strategic establishment has changed a lot since 1962.


16 posted on 07/06/2010 1:08:52 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

China’s, too; as much as I love India and all things Indian - and I’m a major Indophile - I would never bet on them versus China.


17 posted on 07/06/2010 6:08:33 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

Sure, nobody would argue with that. But the PLA has little to gain by going for the kind of adventure it did in 1962, let alone driving beyound Eastern India.


18 posted on 07/06/2010 6:10:50 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Agreed. I’m not saying a southward attack is likely...


19 posted on 07/06/2010 6:15:34 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

my project is ready to make more stealthy


20 posted on 08/24/2010 3:59:27 AM PDT by raja030in
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson