Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lucas McCain
"In other words, is the subject and jurisdiction clause meaningless?"

Quite to the contrary, it's very meaningful. People who would not be "subject to the jurisdiction" thereof would be foreign diplomats and soldiers of an enemy army, or so was opined in Ark.

14 posted on 04/29/2010 2:23:30 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Lucas McCain
"People who would not be "subject to the jurisdiction" thereof would be foreign diplomats and soldiers of an enemy army, or so was opined in Ark."

And, of course their children, as well.

15 posted on 04/29/2010 2:24:33 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand

I agree with ODH’s analysis, and I do not understand him to be AGREEING with the Ark decision. I certainly don’t, although I grant that the 14th Amendment is atrociously worded on this question.

Still, I do support, quixotically, efforts to amend the Constitution to end “citizenship by birth alone.” As nearly all nations do, we should accord newborns the same status held by their birth mothers at the time of birth.


16 posted on 04/29/2010 2:42:03 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson