Well, in this case their password is their identity,
any way what got me was you can see the law, just not
all of it.
What have we become?
Hopefully, what we are, is a nation full of people who can think for themselves. I think most people have internalized a logical definition of identity theft. And, irrespective of explicit language of the statute, there may be jurors who wish to apply their own logical understanding with respect to that term.
In American law, that's fine. It may not be desirable, but there's nothing illegal about it, so long that's not what the defense counsel argued at trial.
They're going to convict on three of the four charges. No one should get bent out of shape about, and to make statements like "What have we become", is silly to the point of ridiculous. Paging Captain Hyperbole.