To: Bigtigermike
Quick verdicts usually mean guilty.
28 posted on
04/29/2010 12:27:09 PM PDT by
HerrBlucher
(END THE WAR ON LIBERTY!)
To: HerrBlucher
Quick verdicts usually mean guilty.
The OJ jury came back after 2 hours..they requested that the limo driver testimony be read back, he was the star witness..and the jury acquitted the butcher of brentwood..so a quick verdict does not mean anything..clearly the OJ jury was toying with the prosecution, making them think they had convicted him when in reality, some raised the “Black power” salute when they got into the room..a quick verdict doesn’t necessarily mean guilty.
To: HerrBlucher
Quick verdicts usually mean guilty.A long, long time ago, I sat on a jury on a criminal case. When we were sent back to the jury room and picked a foreman in about 2 minutes. He suggested we each write our verdict on a piece of paper so we could get an idea of where we stood (that took about 1 minute). All 12 jurors voted not guilty. We didn't want to let both sides know we had a verdict in 3 minutes, so we waited an hour to lunch and delivered the verdict in the afternoon.
90 posted on
04/29/2010 1:08:21 PM PDT by
CharacterCounts
(November 4, 2008 - the day America drank the Kool-Aid)
To: HerrBlucher
I disagree. When you have someones life in the balance, you tend to take more time as these jurors have (3 days or so).
To: HerrBlucher
“Quick verdicts usually mean guilty.”
To the contrary. Quick verdicts usually indicate NOT guilty. When the verdict is guilty, a great deal of time is usually spent in fixing the punishment.
121 posted on
04/29/2010 2:27:30 PM PDT by
SallyH
( wit)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson