The author of the jury handbook also is, shall we say, less than candid in representing the holding of a decision he relies on. In fact, it holds the opposite of what he says.
I don't think I'd rely on that if your life or freedom are at stake.
I don't think I'd rely on that if your life or freedom are at stake.
Unless there's a mind-reader in the courtroom... I don't think someone is going to be able to get inside a person's mind and see how that person made their determination ... :-) And if I think a law is unjust and should not be enforced, then I'll vote not to convict someone on the basis of that unjust law. And there's not anything that anyone can do about that (and that's one of the "beauties" about" knowing stuff" before you go into a situation like that).
What you know in your head "stays in your head" doncha know... :-)