Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: raccoonradio
The reality is they don’t want to face people with an opposing view, even in civil debate.

Why should a liberal run the risk of debating when he can go to one of the vast preponderance of friendly media outlets and LIE with imputinity and without fear of having your lie challenged?

This AZ thing is the latest most obvious example - the glassy eyed, spittle-flecked lies are flying like I've never seen before.

13 posted on 04/29/2010 11:15:30 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: skeeter

>>Why should a liberal run the risk of debating when he can go to one of the vast preponderance of friendly media outlets

My favorite moment was during the Iraq war when Laura Ingraham had a lawyer on from a group called “Lawyers Against the War”. Laura asked him politely whether or not we were better off with Saddam out of power. He refused to answer.
Asked again, refused again, then hung up...and when Laura’s
producer called him back he swore at the producer and hung up. Can’t answer a simple question, and flees when pressed
(politely) to do so.


16 posted on 04/29/2010 11:18:32 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson