[allmendream]

Yes, but the principle of English law ruling him a “natural born subject” was extended to American law and Wong Kim Ark was ruled to be “as much a citizen” as the natural born child of a citizen, according to the same principle.

So citing pre-American law of England and the “law of Nations” is only allowed when it fits yor premise, and rejected when it does not?

[RegulatorCountry]

Yes, but the principle of English law ruling him a “natural born subject” was extended to American law and Wong Kim Ark was ruled to be “as much a citizen” as the natural born child of a citizen, according to the same principle.

Wong Kim Ark was ruled to be a citizen, period. You know that, you've been told again and again and again over the past two years.

And, even that loopy old bloviator Justice Horace Gray couldn't "extend" English law into United States law.

You seem to be having no small amount of difficulty with the three branches of government, and the system of checks and balances created by the three. They are: the Executive, the Judicial and the Legislative.

The powers of each branch are specifically enumerated, meaning limited, by the Constitution itself. I'm sure you're not aware of the unintentional comedy you've provided on this thread, claiming that Congress has the judicial power to rule John McCain a natural born citizen. Now, we get to giggle while you claim the Judicial branch gets to create naturalization laws, which were specifically enumerated to the Legislature.

You've got to be putting us on with this wackiness, just pulling our leg.