I guess you are going to ignore my posts and just make up your own stuff, no wonder the Democrat party can depend on Catholicism to power home their agendas.
I ignored the part you got wrong. You stated:
" The guy tried to imply that the Catholics voting for Obama was unusual, a “sea change”,"
Go back and read my post. Archbishop refuted the presumption that voting for Obama represented a "sea change". That is exactly the opposite of your conclusion.
Now answer my question. Why, other than a perverse curiosity born in an anti-Catholic prejudice, would you lurk on a Catholic topic threads and make critical, nonfactual posts?