Posted on 04/29/2010 7:37:53 AM PDT by Second Amendment First
Nelson, it turns out, wasn’t simply looking out for Buffett -- by every measure the most special interest in his state. He was looking out for himself.
*
“I did not vote no because of Berkshire Hathaway,” he said. “Nor did the fact that I and my wife have owned Berkshire stock for 30+ years have anything to do with my vote. It has never been an issue. It isn't now."
*
So which is it? Ben Nelson, pillar of conservatism? Or Ben Nelson, cesspool of sleaze? The two are not mutually exclusive.
(Excerpt) Read more at voices.washingtonpost.com ...
Hey Post, we’ll get to this guy right after you do your long delayed homework on folks named Rangel and Frank.
When they’re both behind bars, let’s talk, OK.
How about pillar of liberal/progressivism AND cesspool of sleaze that are one in the same.
Nice to know he's a big Berkshire holder. Wasn't aware.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.