Is it just me or does this ex-Democrat/independent sound more conservative than the GOP Nominee Baker. If I were in Massachusetts I'd vote for Tim Cahill. He has embraced the Tea Party, he has embraced more conservative ideas than Charlie Baker who has a radical gay rights activist as a running mate who sponsored the "Transgendered Rights" bill that will further infringe on the rights of individuals and religious organizations to associate with whom they will. Cahill also did not vote for Barack Obama when he was still a Democrat and that is enough for me. Cahill's running mate is firmly Pro-life and a conservative Republican. Tim Cahill isn't perfect but the fairy elephant baby stomping Republican ticket makes him look golden and for Massachusetts he is actually refreshing.
1 posted on
04/28/2010 9:09:25 AM PDT by
Maelstorm
To: Maelstorm
Baker’s running mate Tessei is also openly gay, which is unusual for a “republican.”
2 posted on
04/28/2010 9:14:17 AM PDT by
Boardwalk
To: Maelstorm
Baker is a RINO-Democrat of the Romney-type.
Baker was chosen, not elected.
Cahill is far more conservative.
3 posted on
04/28/2010 9:14:46 AM PDT by
Diogenesis
(Article IV - Section 4 - The United States Â… shall protect each of them against Invasion)
To: Maelstorm
Gotta agree. I’m starting to consider voting for Tim Cahill myself. At least he sounds like a fiscal conservative, which is what this state needs. I like him talking about cuts to gov’t.
5 posted on
04/28/2010 9:19:45 AM PDT by
KEmom
(Getting ready to hop on the Tea Party Express!!!)
To: Maelstorm
Whatever. The upshot from this whole deal is that Obama’s butt-buddy Deval Patrick could very waltz into a second term because of Cahill and Baker splitting the opposition vote.
To: Maelstorm; GOPsterinMA; Impy
15 posted on
04/28/2010 4:05:00 PM PDT by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson