Posted on 04/27/2010 4:49:29 AM PDT by SJackson
If safeguarding international security is the chief aim of US President Barack Obamas foreign policy, then at some point he can be expected to change course in the Middle East. For today, Obama faces the wreckage of every aspect of his Middle East policies. And largely as a consequence of his policies, the region moves ever closer to war.
In Iraq, Obamas pledge to withdraw all combat forces from the country by the summer has emboldened the various forces vying for control of the country to set it ablaze once more.
In Afghanistan, Obamas surge and leave policy has left would-be US allies hedging their bets, at best. And it has caused the USs NATO partners to question the purpose of their deployment in that country.
Then there is Iran. Last weeks report by The New York Times that this January Defense Secretary Robert Gates penned a memo to National Security Advisor James Jones warning that the Obama administration has no effective policy for dealing with Irans nuclear weapons program exposed the bitter truth that in the face of the most acute foreign policy problem they face, Obama and his crew are out to lunch.
Gatess attempt to mitigate the storys impact by claiming that actually, the White House is weighing all its options only made things worse. Even before the ink on his correction note was dry, his Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Michele Flournoy was telling reporters in Singapore that the military option, is not on the table in the near term.
Iran for its part continues to escalate its menacing behavior. Last week its naval forces reportedly interdicted a French ship and an Italian ship navigating through the Straits of Hormuz.
President Shimon Peress announcement last week that Syria has transferred Scud missiles to Hizbullah in Lebanon was a sharp warning that Iran and its underlings are diligently preparing for war with Israel. It also demonstrated that the Obama administrations attempts to use diplomacy to coddle Syria away from Iran have failed completely.
Administration officials statements in the wake of Peress bombshell make clear that Syrias bellicose actions have not caused the US President to reconsider his failed policy. Obamas advisers responded to the news by irrelevantly boasting that their policy of engagement enabled them to bring the matter up with their Syrian interlocutors three times before Peress announcement and once more after he made the statement.
AND THATS not nearly the end of it. As Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced last week, soon the Obama administration will expand its dialogue with Syria by returning the US ambassador to Damascus for the first time since Syrian President Bashar Assad ordered the assassination of former Lebanese prime minister Rafik Hariri five years ago. That is, Obama has chosen to respond to Syrias open brinkmanship by rewarding Assad with newfound legitimacy and panache.
And thats still not the worst of it. What is worst is that Obamas advisers openly admit that they have no idea why Syria remains a rogue state despite their happy talk. As one administration official told Foreign Policy, understanding why Syria Irans Arab client state is acting like Irans Arab client state is, the million dollar question. We do not understand Syrian intentions. No one does, and until we get to that question we can never get to the root of the problem, the official told the magazine.
But while they wait for the Oracle at Damascus to decode itself, they are content to continue wooing Assad as he provokes war.
Then there are the Palestinians. After rejecting Obamas envoy George Mitchells latest plea to conduct indirect negotiations with Israel, Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas explained that Obamas own statements have convinced the Palestinians that there is nothing to negotiate about.
As he put it, Since you, Mr. President, and you, the members of the American administration, believe in [the urgent need for a Palestinian state] it is your duty to call for the steps in order to reach the solution and impose the solution. Impose it. But dont tell me its a vital national strategic American interest... and then not do anything.
Finally there is Israel. In the same week that the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Michael Mullen refused to rule out the possibility that the US will shoot down Israeli jets en route to attack Irans nuclear installations, and Obama again blamed Israel for the deaths of US soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan, Jim Jones tried to reassure Jewish Democrats that despite the administrations hostile actions and statements, it is not hostile to Israel.
Joness speech was part of a very public outreach plan the administration adopted last week in the face of a groundswell of American Jewish anger at Obama for his adversarial posture towards Israel. Given that American Jews have been the Democratic Partys most secure voting bloc since 1932, recent polls showing that the majority of American Jews oppose Obamas treatment of Israel are a political earthquake.
According to a Quinnipiac poll published last week, a whopping 67 percent of American Jews disapprove of Obamas handling of the situation between Israel and the Palestinians. A poll of American Jews taken by John McLaughlin earlier this month showed that a plurality of American Jews would consider voting for a candidate other than Obama in the next presidential elections.
And on Israel, American Jewish disapproval of Obama is fully consonant with the views of the general public. As the Quinnipiac poll shows, only 35 percent of Americans approve of his treatment of Israel.
Joness speech before the Washington Institute for Middle East Policy was a friendly affair. He waxed on dreamily about how wonderful the USs alliance with Israel is and how much Obama values Israel. And the crowd rewarded him with a standing ovation.
But the substance of his speech made absolutely clear that while Obama and his advisors are concerned that for the first time in 80 years a significant number of American Jews may abandon the Democratic Party, they are unwilling to pay even the slightest substantive price to keep the Jews loyal to their party.
After he finished his declarations of love and his joke about crafty Jewish businessmen in Afghanistan, Jones made clear that the Obama administration continues to view Israels refusal to surrender more land to the Palestinians as the key reason its efforts to convince Iran to give up its nuclear program, the Syrians to quit the Iranian axis, the Palestinians and the Lebanese to quit the terror racket and the Iraqis and the Afghans to behave like Americans have all failed.
As he put it, One of the ways that Iran exerts influence in the Middle East is by exploiting the ongoing Arab-Israeli conflict. Iran uses the conflict to keep others in the region on the defensive and to try to limit its own isolation. Ending this conflict, achieving peace between Israelis and Palestinians, and establishing a sovereign Palestinian state would therefore take such an evocative issue away from Iran, Hizbullah, and Hamas.
JONES, OBAMA and the rest of their gang must have been asleep when the Saudis, Egyptians, Jordanians and the rest of the Arabs told them that Iran is unrelated to the Palestinian issue and that it must be stopped from acquiring nuclear weapons regardless of the status of Israeli-Palestinian relations. This after all has been the main message communicated to Obama and his advisers since January 2009 by every Sunni-majority state in the region as well as by many Iraqi Shiites.
They must have been at the golf course when their generals in Iraq and Afghanistan warned them about Iran providing weapons and training to irregular forces killing US servicemen.
The fact that even as he faced a Jewish audience, Jones couldnt resist the temptation to repeat the central fallacy at the root of the administrations failed policies in the Middle East makes clear that the Obama administration fundamentally does not care that the American people as a whole and the American Jewish community specifically oppose its policies. It will continue to push its policies in the face of that opposition no matter what. And if American Jews want to leave the party, well, they shouldnt slam the door on their way out.
The Obama administrations treatment of New York Senator Charles Schumer this week is case in point. Schumer has been one of Obamas most loyal supporters. If as expected Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid loses his reelection bid in November, Schumer is in line to replace him as the Democratic leader in the Senate.
Yet this week, responding to what has likely been an enormous outcry from his constituents, Schumer blasted Obama for his shabby and dangerous treatment of Israel. Rather than respond graciously to Schumers criticism, Obamas spokesman Robert Gibbs dismissed it sneeringly saying, I dont think that its a stretch to say we dont agree with what Senator Schumer said in those remarks.
In his interview last week with Channel 2, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu said he has no doubt that if Obama wishes to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons he is capable of doing so. As he put it, Barack Obama demonstrated his determination with regard to issues he felt were important, and his determination was quite impressive. I think President Obama can show that same determination with regard to Iran.
No doubt Netanyahu is correct. Moreover, the politics of such a move would make sense for him. Whereas Obamas decision to ram the nationalization of the US healthcare industry through Congress against the wishes of the American public caused his personal ratings and those of his party to plummet, were Obama to decide to take on Iran, he would win the overwhelming support of the American public. Indeed, a determined and successful bid by Obama to block Irans nuclear aspirations could potentially block what is currently looking like a midterm election catastrophe for his party in November.
But as Gatess memo about Iran, Clintons announcement that the administration will go ahead with its plan to dispatch an ambassador to Damascus, Mitchells latest failure with the Palestinians, Joness newest accusation against Israel, and the USs strategic incoherence in Iraq and Afghanistan all show, mere politics are irrelevant to Obama. It doesnt bother him that his most loyal supporters abandoning him. It doesnt matter that his policies have endangered the Middle East and the world as a whole.
Obamas refusal to acknowledge his own failures make clear that his goal is different than that of his predecessors. He is here to transform Americas place in the world, not to safeguard the world. And he will move ahead with his transformative change even if it means abetting war. He will push on with his transformative change even if it means that Iran becomes a nuclear power. And he will push on even if it means that US forces are forced to leave Afghanistan and Iraq in defeat.
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
You have hit the nail precisely on the head. Part of the problem Republicans have with trying to combat Obama is that they keep confusing what he considers his successes with what they consider his failures. We are one of the few nations in the world who has a president who hates his own country.
I know it’s important but the stories out of the Middle East haven’t changed much in my whole life. Indeed, for over two millennia. My brain hurts.
An interesting bookshalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiachPROPHECIES FOR THE ERA OF MUSLIM TERROR:
A TORAH PERSPECTIVE ON WORLD EVENTSby
Rabbi Menachem KohenHe cites that HaShem kept the land dissolute
for 1800 years until the Nation was re-gathered.There are no Palestinians, no one lived there.
The Ottoman Empire tried to settle the Land
but hundreds of thousands settlers were run
off by locusts.
BO must be a muslim, he is so transparent of his hate for the Jewish people.
Obama is transparent and he’s also stupid. He keeps poking at Isreal which means he’s poking God in the eye. Just wait till God pokes back. Obama’s end has already been determined by God I’m quite sure. CO
Do not be decieved however into believing the Leadership of the Toe Tapping Republi-Con Party is any better than the Demon-Crats... They held the Presidency, House and Senate and did nothing to deal with the Islamofacists. Nothing finnish the fight. Nothing to deal with 30 million illegals distroying the US Economy for working Americans...
Republi-Con and Demon-Crat Leadership two sides of the same bent degenerate coin.
W
I can explain Syria’s behavior with just three words:
THEY ARE NAZIS.
Any questions?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.