[1rudeboy]

I like how they broke the guys door sometime in the evening rather than just serving the warrant at a decent time like in the morning.

No doubt. If a judge signs-off on a warrant late in the day, the cops should wait until 9am the next morning. If on a Friday, the cops should've waited until Monday, to give a chance for the press to be there . . . and possibly tip off the suspect into destroying evidence of a crime.
/s

[Smogger]

Oh yeah. Clearly he was all consumed with destroying the evidence of his mysterious crime by:

a) Documenting the entire incident including a blow by blow recount of how the phone was obtained and what was learned by disassembling it.

b) Going to dinner with his wife.

[Poison Pill]

No doubt. If a judge signs-off on a warrant late in the day, the cops should wait until 9am the next morning. If on a Friday, the cops should've waited until Monday, to give a chance for the press to be there . . . and possibly tip off the suspect into destroying evidence of a crime. /s

There was no crime. Journalists have very broad protection under Federal law. You would think that a judge would be familiar with the laws that control the Fourth Estate. Was he absent the day they taught the 1st Amendment at law school?

[Star Traveler]

You were saying ...

and possibly tip off the suspect into destroying evidence of a crime.

Yeah... that's hilarious... LOL ...

Some people expect the police, when having a warrant to get those relevant items from some criminal -- that they're supposed to observe some kind of "business hours" and ring the doorbell and come back if no one is home ... doncha know ... :-)