Yes, thanks for asking: I can tell by the points you have ignored in your list the number of points for which you have no response, other than to talk nonsense.
And I must admit, hanging you hat on the argument that "he tried to call Apple" is a novel approach to the law that I had not considered. Please let me know if you ever try to make that argument before a judge. I'll fly in for the laughs.
(The gun wasn't stolen, by the way, nice try).
In other words, you are not even going to try to defend your ridiculous “Apple smart phone is like stealing US nuclear secrets” meme, I take it?
“”he tried to call Apple” is a novel approach to the law that I had not considered”
When you find a product, and identify who the product belongs to, with a phone number, you call the owners and try to return the product(if you are honest), which is what the finder this in this case..REPEATEDLY, all to no avail. Apple just wouldn't take their phone back. They had no problem calling the cps to go break some guy's doors down though.
“Please let me know if you ever try to make that argument before a judge.”
Now why don't we see how far Appple gets with this case in court eh? Especially with the guy that found the phone. Should be a lot of fun in court when the trial starts(if Apple is ready to go to trial that is). These Gestapo tactics have done wonders for Apple's PR so far. Let's hope the case goes to full trial. Google Android phone makers(who are busy grabbing market share even as we speak) will be chuckling with glee at the free PR bonanza.
“(The gun wasn't stolen, by the way, nice try).”
Ummm..you implied it was, just like the phone was left behind by someone..as in right here, in your post # 132:
“much like shooting someone with a gun that was negligently left behind by someone else”