To: penelopesire; Liz; onyx; STARWISE; hoosiermama; Protect the Bill of Rights; SE Mom; Bahbah; ...
Not good for the 0 admin that Blago got nabbed milking his pay-for-play. Fitz’s investigation could derail the WH mob, who did NOT anticipate getting caught in the web.
Tip of the iceberg ... Fitz’s investigation has legs.
19 posted on
04/26/2010 3:29:04 PM PDT by
maggief
(Not everything is what it seems.)
To: maggief; penelopesire; STARWISE
Blago “could” end up being our guy via Fitz...lol.
20 posted on
04/26/2010 3:47:57 PM PDT by
onyx
(Sarah/Michele 2012)
To: maggief
Fitz sure is quiet these days. I hope he hasn’t been bought off.
22 posted on
04/26/2010 3:52:28 PM PDT by
penelopesire
("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
To: maggief
There is no question whose interests Fitz is protecting.
[When did he know who leaked Plame’s name vs When did he close the investigation?]
What better way to keep a tight lid on a man that knows lots of secrets than to keep him tied up as a criminal defendant in a Federal Trial?
I don't think Team Obama counted on Blago being the slyest fox in the den.
To: maggief
Tip of the iceberg ... Fitz’s investigation has legs. ICBW, but I thought Fitz called off the wiretaps when it first started to look as if Zer0 would be caught-up in them.
57 posted on
04/27/2010 11:16:50 AM PDT by
Roccus
(......and then there were none.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson