By his own lights, the defense attorney is right to keep the little s*** off the stand.
The very first question the prosecution would ask him would be aimed straight at his democratic politician daddy. Anybody who thinks for a moment the hacking of Palin’s email was just an “innocent” prank by a dumb kid, is even dumber than the hacker.
Anybody who thinks for a moment the hacking of Palin’s email was just an “innocent” prank by a dumb kid, is even dumber than the hacker.
I don't know the "make-up" of the jury selection, but I would say that the smartest move that the defense could have done -- would be to have parents in the jury pool... because parents actually do know how "stupid their kids are" ... LOL ...
And I'm saying that as a staunch defender of Palin and I think the kid did engage in a crime... as I've said before on previous threads on this topic.
It's just that I also know how stupid kids are (and some parents have stupid 25-year old kids, too... doncha know...).