Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah

Good point. A quick check of Article I Section 8 only speaks of Naturalization. Immigration would then fall under the 10th Amendment. I do stand corrected.


205 posted on 04/25/2010 5:38:51 PM PDT by ex 98C MI Dude (Alea Iacta Est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]


To: ex 98C MI Dude

If it were this easy, Arizona, California, Nevada, Texas should be able to put up their own border fences.


208 posted on 04/25/2010 5:41:40 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]

To: ex 98C MI Dude
See, "immigration" becomes a federal issue only to the extent the USSC (aka SCOTUS) decides there's an implied power at the federal level ~ e.g. protecting the nation's borders could be part of that (the very thing the federales don't want to do of course).

I can see the Solicitor General arguing to the court that even though the SCOTUS has earlier judged that border protection belonged to the federales, they really don't want to do what's necessary because of cost, too much traffic, indolence, etc.

That might well break even Sotomayor!

Arizona has not yet gone to the point of protecting its own borders, but as long as such protection didn't violate interstate commerce I suppose they could do it. In fact, "the people" could do so.

211 posted on 04/25/2010 5:44:03 PM PDT by muawiyah ("Git Out The Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson