Your argument may sound good to you, but it's BS down at the courthouse.
You should go try and see your favorite judge to fix a ticket sometime. They got these big burly guys in uniforms manning the metal detectors and you'd better have a valid ID!
BTW, when you file a Change of Address Order with the Postal Service, you best be able to back it up with a valid ID if querried. Else, you might find yourself being prosecuted for attempting to divert someone else's mail to your custody improperly. It's a felony with a LONG LONG LONG jail term.
So much for claiming privacy rights supremacy.
See ya' in Petersburg ~ there's a Postal Wing down there ~ you'll have lots of knowledgeable custody ~ maybe even talk to a letter carrier or two who knows other schemes.
Really?
I say that because the words I chose to use to describe who this is unconstitutional came right from the pen of Chief Justice John Roberts USSC.
When he spoke about the SUpreme Court's Terry jurisprudence, which has always been applied that a suspect has always had the right to refuse to answer questions put to him by police officers during a Terry stop. And the Fifth Amendment privilege have always attached during custodial interrogations, regardless of the reasoning for the questioning. Once the police detained a suspect for any reason, be it under the reasonable suspicion standard for a brief investigation. Or probable cause to arrest. The 5th amendment applies. As well as, absent probable cause to arrest or seek a warrant any search is also unconstitutional.