Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OneWingedShark
It’s interesting to see the aggressive nature of the crowd, especially in the second video where you can see them following [and crowding] the counter-protester and police.

You bet....These tactics are anarchistic in nature

Watch and listen to the tactics used by the rioters....With the constant horn honking, chanting, knocking and kicking over street barriers, throwing objects at the police, and making as much noise as possible. All while trying to appear as victims.

As if we're supposed to believe this one guys position legitimately set off all 2000 of these people into a murderous rage that could not be controlled. .

One would have to be drooling in a cup to believe that. No sale...

This was just an excuse or simply a pretext to employ these orchestrated tactics in order to politically dictate and run up the "victim" flag.

In reality, much of it is organized chaos to send the threat message while masquerading as victims of racism.

66 posted on 04/25/2010 4:28:27 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: dragnet2

>You bet....These tactics are anarchistic in nature
[snip]
>As if we’re supposed to believe this one guys position legitimately set off all 2000 of these people into a murderous rage that could not be controlled.

One or two people might be expected/understandable [outliers in statistics]... but that the crowd itself is moving suggests that is a property of the population, not some ‘statistical aberrations.’

>In reality, much of it is organized chaos to send the threat message while masquerading as victims of racism.

Indeed. Something I’ve witnessed in government is a sort of ‘defense’ against some punishment by pointing out the wrong-doings of the person doing the accusing. It seems to me, intuitively, that the two are related as in different manifestations of the same underlying root-cause... what’s frustrating is that I cannot currently identify that commonality.

>This was just an excuse or simply a pretext to employ these orchestrated tactics in order to politically dictate and run up the “victim” flag.

Now this brings us to an interesting speculation-point. What if the counter-protester refused to be intimidated and victimized... AZ just passed constitutional carry, and as I said before that it would be completely understandable if they felt in fear of their lives and acted upon it.

So then, what would have happened if there had been an armed group of counter protesters that decided to protect themselves? I wonder how [large] the media would spin it.

Putting myself into the scenario just outlined, I think I’d want to be armed with a PS-90... fairly accurate, semi-auto, and 50-round-magazines.


67 posted on 04/25/2010 4:45:14 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson