Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: naturalman1975
They don’t have any fighters any more, but still have a range of other aircraft

Sad. For a nation of their size, 24 fighters would do, if nothing else than to exemplify national pride, and that terrorists might think twice.

8 posted on 04/24/2010 8:07:49 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: buccaneer81

Yes - they wouldn’t need a large force, but it also means you keep the skills intact for the future. Even if they’d just kept their last Skyhawk squadrons flying, at least you’ve got pilots flying and mechanics doing their job, meaning it’s easier to upgrade later. Now, they’d have to rebuild from scratch.

And the Skyhawks still had some credibility - equipped with Sidewinders they were a lot better than nothing.

Would have been better still if the F-16 purchase hadn’t been cancelled - but even after that, they could have maintained something worthwhile.


9 posted on 04/24/2010 8:12:18 PM PDT by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: buccaneer81

Actually, technically, they do have 17 Aermacchi MB-339s in storage, so if they trained pilots and ground crew, they could have some sort of force. And again the Aermacchi can handle Sidewinders and Mavericks. It’d be better than nothing.


11 posted on 04/24/2010 8:17:07 PM PDT by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson