Show me where and when?
No, I choose the law & Constitution.
So do we, and I swore to do that when I became a U.S. citizen and I never forget that, including that your dear leader is NOT a NBC, but got his foot into the White House by fraud and you still approve of it. I DON'T, because he committed a crime against the Constitution, period!
The courts have no role to play in removing a sitting President.
That's your petty opinion, but when a crime is committed, by your dear leader and certainly also by one part of Congress, that crime can ONLY be settled by the court, NOT by the ballot box!!
And based on stuff I've read written years prior to Obama, the only controversy over NBC was a McCain-type case - when can a person born abroad be considered a NBC.
With your sharp military mind (ref. to all your great photos) has it never occurred to you strange that five democRATic Senators would sponsor a Senate resolution to make McCain eligible. Why did that resolution surfaced by the DNC-member sponsors including your dear leader and Hillary, if it was not to fool the American people, including you and cover for your dear leader's illegalities??
As for dan and Vietnam, my Dad was killed in Vietnam.
I have no reason to believe your Dad was NOT an honorable man, and certainly sympathize with your grievance and terrible lost. That said I don't see that you honor his memories of being victim of Vietnam, because your postings here against an honorable man Ltc. Lakin & your dear leader resembling to what John sKerry did in Paris still being in uniform!!!
That is why both McCain & Palin refuse to advance birther claims,
Yes McCain because of the resolution I mentioned above, but this the problem with you misleading that Palin is refusing, that's far from the truth. She would have loved to thread your dear leader's qualifications to pieces, but John's campaign put a muzzle on her!!!!
But you mighty Internet Warriors won't care. You just mouth off without reading or researching the law, and then call anyone who disagrees with you a traitor. I'll let anyone who reads this thread decide for themselves who is mouth, and who is not...
ODH tried to denigrate my credentials also, so go to my response to him and see comparison of Apples to Oranges, which naturally in his elitists mindset was that my English (which is my third language) was not good enough to understand his lawyer language sufficiently. Have a nice evening!!!!!
And lastly again YOU have not used name-calling???
Your post speaks for itself.
One additional comment, to clarify things for folks:
Under “Stupid Controversies”, Sarah Palin wrote (Thursday, December 3, 2009 at 10:16pm):
“Voters have every right to ask candidates for information if they so choose. I’ve pointed out that it was seemingly fair game during the 2008 election for many on the left to badger my doctor and lawyer for proof that Trig is in fact my child. Conspiracy-minded reporters and voters had a right to ask... which they have repeatedly. But at no point – not during the campaign, and not during recent interviews – have I asked the president to produce his birth certificate or suggested that he was not born in the United States.”
http://www.facebook.com/notes/sarah-palin/stupid-conspiracies/188707498434
It is absolutely unconscionable to suggest that Mr Rogers is dishonoring his father's death in Vietnam based solely on his comments regarding LTC Lakin's court martial. His belief that LTC Lakin stands no chance of obtaining discovery of Obama's birth certificate is based on a reasonable interpretation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice and is shared by many far more knowledgeable in the UCMJ.
And comparing Mr Rogers to John Kerry, who accused his fellow servicemen of war crimes during his testimony to Congress, is even more disgusting and reprehensible. The sad thing is that you don't have the character to be ashamed of yourself.
Furthermore, if Obama was born in Hawaii, then he didn't "commit a crime against the Constitution" because the Constitution does not define who is a natural born citizen. And since the SCOTUS has never ruled on a circumstance like Obama's, there is no precedent established that Obama is not a natural born citizen.
That's why we need a SCOTUS ruling.