You are the one criticizing his qualifications. So post your qualifications to criticize. You've already admitted that you were not trained in the Constitution. So then what is your authority to say anything in that regard???
Wasn't trained in the Constitution? I said I'm not a constitutional attorney - that is to say, an appellate lawyer that focuses on constitutional issues. And for the record, neither is Apuzzo.
But, I don't purport to be a constitutional lawyer, nor would I expect my postings to be disseminated to en masse and referenced as authoritative, as Apuzzo's seem to be with great frequency.
If you had a DUI case, or a personal injury claim, Apuzzo might be the go-to guy. But on the subject-matter at hand, his CV seems more than wanting.
As I said before, I'll say again - find me well-researched articles, essays and opinions from people who actually make their living in the appropriate areas of law, and have some reputation for excellence & accomplishment in their field, and people like me would start to listen. But, the opinions, assertions, claims and musings of amateurs or unremarkable attorneys, I don't find compelling, and neither should anyone else.