Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Chip
"All of whom, like you, cannot and will not truthfully answer the question:

"Is Barack Obama an Article II natural born citizen as required by our Constitution and thus qualified to be President?"."

Because, as a matter law, that question is no longer relevant to Obama's current term, at least from the perspective of the Judiciary. This is the concept birthers cannot wrap their heads around, but that doesn't mean the concept is legally defective.

172 posted on 04/25/2010 1:21:52 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]


To: OldDeckHand
Because, as a matter law, that question is no longer relevant to Obama's current term, at least from the perspective of the Judiciary. This is the concept birthers cannot wrap their heads around, but that doesn't mean the concept is legally defective.

That's fine if that's your opinion for what it's worth.

So given that opinion, the answer to the question won't hurt anything for you or them, will it???

Then we can start with you answering that "meaningless" question:

Is Barack Obama an Article II natural born citizen as required by our Constitution and thus qualified to be President? Yes or No.

174 posted on 04/25/2010 1:42:18 PM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson