Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: old republic
View the matter through the perspective of international relations. A President encumbered with claims of jurisdiction by another nation is not entirely free to operate in the sole best interests of this nation, in treaty negotiations or in times of war. We're talking about the Commander-in-Chief of the military, after all. Recall Jay's hint to Washington. What role was his specific concern, regarding foreigners? It was the Commander-in-Chief of the military. International, not domestic.

So, the divided loyalty argument is not so much pertaining to thoughts in the mind of a President, as it is a matter of law between nations. The Founders sought to avoid such entanglements and intrigues, and legally structured eligibility to office in the executive branch in such a way as to preclude them legally, which was the only means at their disposal.

152 posted on 04/24/2010 8:25:20 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]


To: RegulatorCountry
So, the divided loyalty argument is not so much pertaining to thoughts in the mind of a President, as it is a matter of law between nations. The Founders sought to avoid such entanglements and intrigues, and legally structured eligibility to office in the executive branch in such a way as to preclude them legally, which was the only means at their disposal.

I agree. The founders particularly wanted to keep foreign influence on the Commander-in-Chief to a minimum, because of what was going on in Poland in the 1772. The partitions of Poland were enabled in no small part to foreign influence exerted on the Polish government by calculating foreign powers who often bribed Polish officials to exercise their veto in the legislature. The situation effectively rendered Poland a vassal state of foreign powers and it was partitioned up over the 1770s and 90s. In the US, the Electoral College was also devised to prevent foreign influence on the election of a President which would inevitably occur if the choice of President was given to the legislature. Here is an interesting article on the Natural born Citizen Clause and its history at the Constitutional Convention.

http://faculty.maxwell.syr.edu/jyinger/citizenship/history.htm

162 posted on 04/25/2010 12:41:12 AM PDT by old republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson