Obama slams 'misguided' Ariz. immigration bill

WASHINGTON (AP) - President Barack Obama criticized Arizona's tough immigration bill as irresponsible Friday and said his administration is examining whether it would violate civil rights.

Obama said the federal government must act responsibly to reform national immigration law—or "open the door to irresponsibility by others."

"That includes, for example, the recent efforts in Arizona, which threaten to undermine basic notions of fairness that we cherish as Americans, as well as the trust between police and their communities that is so crucial to keeping us safe," Obama said.

Here’s some probable cause

http://www.immigrationshumancost.org/text/crimevictims.html

After the fact identity demands examples from
http://www.immigrationshumancost.org/text/crimevictims.html

...During a 10-month period (Jan 2009 to Oct. 2009), 1,735 illegal aliens were processed by the Wake County Sheriff’s Office. Of those, 809 were for non-alcohol related traffic offenses, 506 were for drunk driving, 203 were for drug offenses, 153 were for larceny, 102 were for domestic violence, 43 were for weapons offenses, 43 were for sex offenses and 10 were for murder. These numbers were nicely laid out in a chart that had the minor traffic offenses at the top, while the rest of the charges were tabulated in descending order by occurrence...

So while politicians in AZ are getting around to responding to their constituents demands for relief from the costly burden of the invasion, it is not surprising the self appointed defenders of the indefensible are expressing outrage at the nerve of Americans once again fighting to defend themselves from the loss of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. A fight only made necessary by the invaders original crime of entering our Country illegally.

The outrage expressed by the open border advocates, those minions of the modern slave masters, just doesn’t matter anymore. The increasing threats of and actual cases of violence committed against the long suffering citizens of the Unted States once again hold precedence. At least in Arizona.

Twisting our laws into a platform for the lawless is a leftist tactic that an awakened America has had their full of.

Continuing the leftist’s insults of We the People, the legitimate back bone of our Nation, will only have the same effect those ‘day without illegals’ marches did back in ‘06.

So go on, get offended over an illegals imagined right. You can even try to use the argument that this bill further erodes the power of our Constitution. The fact of the matter is, the invaders presence in our Country has long been used to destroy the rights of the American working class. We’re just beginning to take them all back.

It isn't about an “illegals rights” as you so stupidly put it you moron.

YOU HAVE TO HAVE PROBABLE CAUSE, WHAT GIVES YOU THE PROBABLE CAUSE THAT THEY ARE IN THE COUNTRY ILLEGALLY?!!!

YOU said it's not skin color, language or racial/ethnic appearance. Everything else you have said applies to any kind of criminal act: Fleeing a legit traffic stop could be because of any number of criminal reasons.

ONCE AGAIN, GET IT THROUGH YOUR THICK HEAD: YOU....DO....NOT...HAVE...ANY...PROBABLE CAUSE!!!

I am here in AZ seeing this everyday and like it less than you do. THAT has nothing to do with this overly broad, unconstitutional law.

I don’t know what you’re reading but I never said most of what you attributed to me.

Are you psychologically unsound or are you employed by the Obama administration? Of course, from what I’ve observed psychologicical instability is a valued trait in the administration.

And while you will never get me to believe you are from Arizona I will accept you are a Columbia school of law graduate (’67) who through political connections finally got that job in the justice department. Good luck with that. The justice department has a high turnover rate these last couple of years. That promised pension may not be available.

John??? Is that you??? You old dog, you almost had me there for a minute! Looks like Grover’s Islamic Institute staff is still writing your material. I thought you said you weren’t going to use them again until after your campaign is over?

Fish shoot you in a barrel. That was funny. You shouldn’t let Grover’s people in the Institute use their recent arrivals to write anything for you. It’s way too transparent. If you know what I mean. LOL!

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.