Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mstar
Yes, and obviously part of the “con”, one that the papers and lamestream media is fully participating in; is that this bill will PROVIDE coverage, rather than REQUIREING coverage.

There is quite a bit of difference between your uncle telling you that in 2014 he is giving you a bike, and your uncle telling you that in 2014 you are required to HAVE a bike or you get your allowance taken away.

And yet the media is all pretending that we all get new “bikes” in 2014, instead of being fined if you do not have a “bike”.

185 posted on 04/23/2010 4:19:35 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream
your uncle telling you that in 2014 he is giving you a bike, and your uncle telling you that in 2014 you are required to HAVE a bike or you get your allowance taken away.

I think it is time to run away from Uncle's
192 posted on 04/23/2010 4:39:15 PM PDT by mstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson