Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers

Has there been any actual cases on this brought to court? So far the cases have been turned away due to standing. No court I know of has weighed in on the meaning of natural born.

When did Congress?


45 posted on 04/23/2010 9:27:57 AM PDT by RWGinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: RWGinger

If you ask that guy anything, you are asking to be misled with faleshoods or fake assumptions.


190 posted on 04/23/2010 12:02:01 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: RWGinger

The Congress has the sole power, from the U.S. Constitution, to remove a sitting president. Congress delegated it’s power, by Quo Warranto, to remove a usurper from the Presidency to the District Court of Washington D.C.

To file a lawsuit against the President of the United States via Quo Warranto one must have standing.

To have standing one must prove having been hurt by actions of this President. For example, illegally losing a Chrysler dealership, and thus your livelihood, would provide standing to sue.

This lawsuit would be interesting in that the President MUST prove that he had the authority to do the deed. Those filing the lawsuit only have to prove they’ve been grievously harmed.


256 posted on 04/23/2010 4:33:07 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO Foreign Nationals as our President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson