[K-oneTexas]

Your logic eludes me. You seem to be all over the map with your questions and comments.

Everyone now pays and is reimbursed to a certain level. It even brings the wealthy into paying, since they didn’t pay income tax under the current system (capital gains remember and at a lower rate that the workers).

Additionally the wealthy don not pay payroll taxes since they do not have a ‘wage’ subject to these taxes (living off their investments).

[NC28203]

>>>Your logic eludes me. You seem to be all over the map with your questions and comments.

Let me review:
1. The author cited an issue with the large number of households who pay no income tax or even receive back more than they pay in.
2. The author proposed a consumption tax to make it so that more households participate in paying taxes.
3. I noted that since 47% of households currently pay no net income tax, then a consumption tax would likely result in some of those households, paying higher taxes, otherwise the author's reason for going to a consumption tax does not resolve the problem cited in point 1.
4. You presented an example of the effects of consumption tax on a middle class family, and I pointed out that the example would result in an additional family getting a net gain from the government that had been a net payor before.
5. I further noted that this would only enhance the problems cited by the author in point 1.
6. You noted that wealthy housholds not previously paying taxes will be added to the tax rolls.
7. So in summary, you are saying that a consumption tax will move more wealthy households onto the tax rolls than it removes middle class households.
Is that correct?