While 'we ASSumed' how about Obama finally put it to rest by at least showing he was born in Hawaii?
And apparently you still have trouble with English. She already knows Obamas father was born in Kenya (then part of the UK).
I admit there maybe thousands of arcane English words that I'm not familiar with, but you have an After-Birther comprehension problem.
I again point out,
Palin: I think the public, rightfully, is still making it an issue. I dont have a problem with that. I dont know if I would have to bother to make it an issue cause I think there are enough members of the electorate who still want answers.
Here Palin says she is not making it a central issue. The birth certificate question does also encompass the jus sanguinis question. As we see when she says "the electorate" who are the citizens of this country still want answerS.
Not just an answer but ANSWERS - plural. So it is assumed that Obama's daddy was Kenyan. Again, you fail the logic test. Because people in the leftist media and the so-called country leaders do not make it an issue that Obama is not an natural born citizen, does make him an NBC.
Lets put this in a simple and an understandable way: 2 + 2 = 4 right? No matter what people say 2 + 2 is always 4 - right?
If everyone said 2 + 2 = 5 does it equal 5? According to your logic 2 + 2 = 5 because they all say so.
If 100 billion people say 2 + 2 = 5 then you think it must be true...by your logic. So when it was "commonly accepted" that Barack Obama's father is Kenyan and Jr. became a president of the United States, that makes Obama eligible under Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the US Constitution ...no matter if he is not...by your silly logic.
Palin has NOT claimed anywhere at any time that Obama is ineligible for President because his father wasn’t a US citizen. That is what I said, and you cannot refute.
“Lets put this in a simple and an understandable way: 2 + 2 = 4 right? No matter what people say 2 + 2 is always 4 - right?”
You assume your interpretation is true. Then you state that it must be true. It doesn’t work that way. We are not dealing with math, or a simple addition problem. If we were, there would be no debate. There is only one right answer in math.
However, the debate is over the meaning of “natural born citizen”. There are multiple interpretations possible. And yes, the states, voters, Congress and the Supreme Court have allowed someone they KNEW had a foreigner for a father become President.
Therefor, we can safely assume the states, voters, Congress and the Supreme Court use a different definition than you do. In other words, in the real world, 2+2 DOES equal 4, and you are the odd man out claiming 17.