Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldDeckHand; P-Marlowe; blue-duncan
nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation

Private use is not public use.

Public purpose is not public use.

Only public use is public use.

I'm not real sure what is hard to understand about that. If they take my lot and give it to a hotel chain, they have not met the public use requirement.

24 posted on 04/22/2010 5:04:18 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: xzins; P-Marlowe; blue-duncan
"I'm not real sure what is hard to understand about that. If they take my lot and give it to a hotel chain, they have not met the public use requirement."

I agree completely. It's and absolute bastardization of the 5th Amendment amplified by the general welfare clause run amok. But, Kelo has screwed the pooch in this regard. Until we get Kennedy replaced by a real conservative, this is going to continue to happen throughout the country. It's sickening.

25 posted on 04/22/2010 5:12:52 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson