To: Canedawg
Schwilk...also pointed out again that Jimenez was an illegal alien and had obviously broken laws by entering the U.S. illegally. How did Mr. Schwilk prove that affirmative defense ?
77 posted on
04/20/2010 10:13:02 AM PDT by
kbennkc
(For those who have fought for it , freedom has a flavor the protected will never know F Trp 8th Cav)
To: kbennkc
There may have been info in the plaintiff’s Complaint that identified where he resided and what his legal standing was to commence the lawsuit.
The defendant may have been able to construct permissible inferences from that.
79 posted on
04/20/2010 10:16:50 AM PDT by
Canedawg
(I'm not digging this tyranny thing.)
To: kbennkc
How did Mr. Schwilk prove that affirmative defense ? Yeah, good question. And that's an affirmative defense to the issue of the use of the word "criminal". Wouldn't avail you much on the issue of falsely claiming someone was wanted for robbery.
81 posted on
04/20/2010 10:20:37 AM PDT by
ArmstedFragg
(hoaxy dopey changey)
To: kbennkc
How did Mr. Schwilk prove that affirmative defense ?See the quote in my post #80. The plaintiff had been tried in criminal court in 2007.
83 posted on
04/20/2010 10:26:02 AM PDT by
bcsco
(Obama: Hokus Pokus POTUS)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson