Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RicocheT

What is interesting is that Amazon (I believe) doesn’t have ANY actual business holdings in the state of North Carolina. Essentially, NC is asking to review the financials of a company for which it has no jurisdiction or oversight authority.


4 posted on 04/20/2010 8:57:20 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: OldDeckHand

>>What is interesting is that Amazon (I believe) doesn’t have ANY actual business holdings in the state of North Carolina. Essentially, NC is asking to review the financials of a company for which it has no jurisdiction or oversight authority.<<

This. I think you have essentially nailed it. I wonder, though, how the state of NY successfully getting tobbacco tax info on people who bought mail order cigarrettes would play into this. Come to think of it, I think Washington state did the same thing.

And I believe they were successful at billing the residents for unpaid tax.


12 posted on 04/20/2010 9:44:50 AM PDT by RobRoy (The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand
What is interesting is that Amazon (I believe) doesn’t have ANY actual business holdings in the state of North Carolina. Essentially, NC is asking to review the financials of a company for which it has no jurisdiction or oversight authority.

Essentially NC believes it has the right to know what residents of NC buy, read, and watch.

Then again, Obama won North Carolina, so I guess I shouldn't be surprised that such a state believes it has the right to access its residents' buying habits.
22 posted on 04/20/2010 10:50:11 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson