Yes, and many of those judges have had birther cases brought before them and dismissed them for lack of standing.
Birthers don't need sympathetic judges, they need better lawyers.
It is interesting to me that there seem to be three things going on with respect to the court challenges to The Marxixt Onada’s presidential eligibility.
The first, is a fear of being called a racist by the judiciary in it takes on the case. The second thing is that hearing the case, would settle the issue once and for all. That would clear the air so we can al move on.
A third thing that is going on, IMHO, is a fear by the judiciary to even open the can of worms. What would happen if Onada could not establish his birth country? Would he leave quietly. Or will he stir the race pot in an attept to cling to office? What will the majority of Americans be prepared to do if he refuses to step aside?
It may be, to avoid a race war (which I don’t think is inevitable on a large scale), the country simply allows him to sit it out until the next election. If it were me, I would only allow that if Onada agrees to be silent—specifically I mean that he be proscribed from advancing his political agenda.
I expect more states will follow Arizona’s lead and require credible country of birth proof for a candidate to be on a US predsidential ballot in that state. This should prevent the demrat shananigans that occured in the 2009 elections. In the past, the political parties self vetted their candidate. Those were the days when people were Americans who supported the Constitution and capitalism. The media backed up that vetting by doing presidentail bios and fact checking—including birth certificated.
Demrat Party leadership has moved a long way from that concept. It wants America to be like any Marxist dictstorship you can name.