You’re sending me a decision from a state court.
Ha, ha, ha! What an idiot.
“Ankeny v The Governor of Indiana” challenged the awarding of Indiana’s electoral votes to Obama. If it had succeeded it is likely that other states would have invalidated Obama’s electoral votes as well.
You’re so ignorant that you don’t even realize that the thread you are posting on is about a STATE legislature’s attempt to impose a birth certificate requirement on presidential candidates IN THAT ONE STATE!
However, if a legal decision from a FEDERAL court turns you on, here are the words once again of Ronald Wilson Reagan appointed Chief US District Judge Royce Lamberth in laughing birther attorney Orly Taitz’s quo warranto case out of his court:
“This is one of several such suits filed by Ms. Taitz in her quixotic attempt to prove that President Obama is not a natural born citizen as required by Constitution. See U.S. CONST. art. II, § 1. This Court is not willing to go tilting at windmills with her.”
If you’d like me to post twenty FEDERAL court decisions concerning Obama’s eligibility, just ask, fool.
I’ll get you started with five:
(1) Barnett, Keyes et al v Obama et al, Federal Court, Central District of California: DISMISSED
(2) Berg v Obama, et.al, Federal Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania and US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, and the US Supreme Court, dismissed and SCOTUS application DENIED.
(3) Cohen v Obama, US District Court for Washington DC, DISMISSED.
(4) Cook v Good, et. al, US Federal Court for the Middle District of Georgia, DISMISSED; Appeal US Court of Appeals for the 11th District, DISMISSED.
(5) Craig v US, US Federal Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, DISMISSED, Appeal, 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, DISMISSAL AFFIRMED.
You happy now?
I'll be happy when you and the rest of the scumbag Obots that infest this place crawl back under whatever rock you came from.