Replies

Fukino affirmed she saw a computer print out with the name Obama on it.

Read the damned statement.

But, it doesn’t matter. Obama could have been born in the Rotunda of the Capital, and he still would have been a dual-citizen, and ineligible to serve as CiC.

From the Indiana Court of Appeals’ decision in “Ankeny et. al. v Mitch Daniels, the Governor of Indiana:”
“Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. Just as a person “born within the British dominions [was] a natural-born British subject” at the time of the framing of the U.S. Constitution, so too were those “born in the allegiance of the United States natural-born citizens.”—Indiana Court of Appeals, Ankeny et. al. v The Governor of Indiana, Mitch Daniels, Nov. 12, 2009

There is NO Constitutional requirement that a person’s parents must be US citizens in order for their offspring to be a natural born citizen and eligible for the presidency. The Constitution is mute on that issue and no court decision has EVER adjudicated that issue. There is no law ever passed by Congress to that effect.
There are Court decisions which uphold the 14th Amendment’s position that there are only two classifications of citizens: born citizens and naturalized citizens. Any born citizen is eligible to be president and no naturalized citizen is eligible to be president.

The fact that Barack Hussein Obama II IS the 44th President of the United States and he was certified as such by Vice President Dick Cheney at a joint session of Congress and that fact that he was sworn in as such by Chief Justice John Roberts and more than 70 court adjudications including 7 rejections of appeals at the U.S. Supreme Court have failed to produce one single legal opinion to the contrary is proof of my position.