“I’ve already debunked the rational that Ankeny put forth. They undermined their decision by acknolwedging Wong Kim Ark declared no specific person to be a natural born citizen. Second, their decision (and the Indiana Supreme Court’s) to affirm the motion to dismiss was based on the plaintiff’s alleged failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted,not their infirm interpretation of natural born citizen or any claim of eligibility. That was tacked on nonsense.”
When any court in the nation backs up your specious points of view, I’ll take notice. Until then, you and your “debunkings” are irrelevant.
“This is one of several such suits filed by Ms. Taitz in her quixotic attempt to prove that President Obama is not a natural born citizen as required by Constitution. See U.S. CONST. art. II, § 1. This Court is not willing to go tilting at windmills with her.”—US Chief Judge Royce Lamberth in dismissing “Taitz v Obama” petition for quo warranto and other claims. April 14, 2010. US District Court for the District of Columbia
Evidently you care a lot since you wrote such a lengthy, but pointless reply.
When any court in the nation backs up your specious points of view, I’ll take notice. Until then, you and your “debunkings” are irrelevant.
Sorry, but this is a sand head response. You're ignoring that the cases have not been heard on merits over Obama's eligibility but denied for procedural reasons ... including Ankeny.