Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jamese777
Interesting! So you don’t believe that Obama is guilty of forgery and fraud which are criminal offenses and would therefore be prosecuted with indictments handed down by Grand Juries.

You are full of false assumptions. We've had this same conversation before where I spanked you illogical behind.

Plain old lying on the Internet is not crime. Anyone can point to a image online and say anything about it as they like without breaking the law. Now, if Obama used that image everyone calls a Certification of Live Birth in an official capacity as to falsify government documents using it as proof, then he could be prosecuted for wrong doing if it is not genuine. Alas, Obama and his sycophants can lie to their heart's content without retribution. Obama has never publicly associated himself with that silly image that you think as real. He keeps his distance for a 'plausible deniability' excuse and lets his koolaid drinkers promote it as real.

You can take it to the bank Obot that Obama will never show that forgery in a court of law.

163 posted on 04/20/2010 6:10:02 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]


To: Red Steel

You are full of false assumptions. We’ve had this same conversation before where I spanked you illogical behind.

Plain old lying on the Internet is not crime. Anyone can point to a image online and say anything about it as they like without breaking the law. Now, if Obama used that image everyone calls a Certification of Live Birth in an official capacity as to falsify government documents using it as proof, then he could be prosecuted for wrong doing if it is not genuine. Alas, Obama and his sycophants can lie to their heart’s content without retribution. Obama has never publicly associated himself with that silly image that you think as real. He keeps his distance for a ‘plausible deniability’ excuse and lets his koolaid drinkers promote it as real.

You can take it to the bank Obot that Obama will never show that forgery in a court of law.


Let me get this straight. You think that Obama posted one forged document on the internet and that he has used another, not forged document to verify his birth date and birth place in case he ever is in court? Is that your “theory!”
The “FIGHT THE SMEARS” website was an official sub-division of the “Obama For President” campaign. HE is responsible for it.

Once again, neither you nor I have any idea what evidence has been submitted in defendants’ legal briefs to the Courts that have looked at the eligibility issue.
Just because you call something a forgery doesn’t make it so.
Back in August of 2008, WorldNetDaily, not exactly a pro-Obot website had its own independent forgery experts examine the Obama online COLB and they concluded that it was “most likely” authentic.
From WorldNetDaily:
“A separate WND investigation into Obama’s certification of live birth utilizing forgery experts also found the document to be authentic. The investigation also revealed methods used by some of the bloggers to determine the document was fake involved forgeries, in that a few bloggers added text and images to the certificate scan that weren’t originally there.
(Editor’s Note: WND’s investigation into the certification of live birth did not include inspecting the actual document, but only asking experts to evaluate the online image. Those experts, therefore, could not “prove” the document’s authenticity. The experts told WND merely that many of the forgery claims made against the image were inconclusive or falsified, leaving them no evidence that would cast doubt on the image’s authenticity.)
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=73214


195 posted on 04/21/2010 12:29:53 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson