[jamese777]

As you know, the ‘vital birth records’ in Hawaii can be erronous since the source can be from the word of person(s) who claimed to have witnessed a birth in the state of Hawaii. And “verifying” the unknown type of ‘vital records’ is a misleading statement. 2nd, Fukino lack of knowledge on the subject of who is a ‘natural born American citizen’ or is not one is an irrelevant statement that can be totally ignored.

---

What’s your explanation as to why no one has subpoenaed Obama’s birth records? Hawaii statutes allow birth records to be released to “A person whose right to inspect or obtain a certified copy of the record is established by an order of a court of competent jurisdiction.”

Obama’s permission to release his records is not required under Hawaii Revised Statutes 338-18(b)(9).
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrs2006/Vol06_Ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0018.HTM

[Red Steel]

What’s your explanation as to why no one has subpoenaed Obama’s birth records? Hawaii statutes allow birth records to be released to “A person whose right to inspect or obtain a certified copy of the record is established by an order of a court of competent jurisdiction.”

That day may come when a court subpoenas all of Obama's records. When the twin issues of standing and political question are overcome for whatever reason. The case against Obama will go forward where the State of Hawaii will be compelled by law to give up all and any Obama 'vital records' they may have.