Since it’s so explicit, what are these vital records that were cited and when are they dated?
The birth announcements prove beyond reasonable doubt that there was a vital record generated some time during the week of August 11, 1961. Since that was within a short time frame of Bambi's birth, the only possible source of that record could have been a standard birth certificate.
We know it couldn't be a certificate of Hawaiian birth, since those weren't generated unless the child was over a year old. We know it couldn't be a certificate of delayed birth, since those were generated only if the birth was registered some months after the fact, whereas Obama's was registered within days.
So we know he must have a standard birth certificate on file. Since Hawaii did not register foriegn births in 1982, we also know it must list Hawaii as the birth place.
In the face of this evidence, the only possible way to dispute a Hawaiian birth is to argue that his birth was registered fraudulantly. Unfortuantely for birthers, there is exactly zero evidence for such fraud.
Even worse for the birther case, there was no motive to for his mother to fraudulantly register his brith in Hawaii, even if he were born outside the US.
"Since Hawaii did not register foriegn births in 1982, we also know it must list Hawaii as the birth place."
It should read:
"Since Hawaii did not register foriegn births until 1982, we also know it must list Hawaii as the birth place."