Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jamese777
...since no case has gone to trial, the legal expenses are nil.

Shows you what you know about attorneys and "billable hours."

You Obots are a giggle. The way you have to twist the facts of real life to defend your champion.

What is your motivation for defending ther usurper so vigorously? Is it the love that no one dare speak? Are you also a die-hard Marxist? Maybe you're just as dumb as a stump, and really believe Obama is all that.

You sure have a problem, whatever the answer.

128 posted on 04/20/2010 1:55:34 PM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: Beckwith

Shows you what you know about attorneys and “billable hours.”

You Obots are a giggle. The way you have to twist the facts of real life to defend your champion.

What is your motivation for defending ther usurper so vigorously? Is it the love that no one dare speak? Are you also a die-hard Marxist? Maybe you’re just as dumb as a stump, and really believe Obama is all that.

You sure have a problem, whatever the answer.


I’m happy to be able to provide you with the giggle, laughter is good for the soul!

My motivation is that I hate to see good people such as yourself with strong convictions used as dupes.

There’s an old cliche’ “if you go to strike the king, you must kill him.”

Every time an unsubstantiated rumor is exposed, every time a fake Kenyan birth certificate shows up, every time a poorly written legal brief is submitted with spelling errors and poor grammar and is rejected by a judge or a court, it benefits Obama.

From Obama’s perspective, the eligibility issue helps him with his base. He gets to play the victim and win lawsuit after lawsuit.

Obama got 67% of the vote of a certain bloc of voters. That bloc of voters are often stereotyped and castigated for not being natural born American citizens and as a voting bloc, they are increasing in number and political power with each election. Who are they? Here’s a hint: most of them speak Spanish. Whenever another Obama lawsuit is thrown out, Obama is somewhere smiling and solidifying the liberal base. That has happened 69 times now. How often have YOU smiled at the conclusion of an Obama eligibility lawsuit?

Don’t you even wonder why no major conservative leader, no conservative member of Congress and no conservative legal organization has joined in any of the eligibility lawsuits?
Nah, I’m not a Marxist, just your run of the mill libertarian, sorry to disappoint.

When Judge Carter in California dismissed the Keyes v Obama lawsuit he wrote in his dismissal order that Alan Keyes came the closest of anyone thus far to meeting the criteria for legal standing to sue Obama since he was an actual presidential candidate. Imagine if John McCain or the McCain-Palin campaign had filed suit. They actually were the only other candidates to receive Electoral College votes. Judge Carter was intimating that they would have standing to sue. But they haven’t sued.

You have yourself a nice day now.


134 posted on 04/20/2010 2:25:03 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson