[Sudetenland]

Ah, the old "newbie" argument. Yeah that's a substantial argument in favor of your views./roll eyes

Palin's experience level is about on a parr with Obama's. She does have limited executive experience, but she is nowhere near being prepared for the responsibilities of being POTUS and anyone who claims the opposite is, in my opinion, simply conning themselves.

Your last comment is as contemptible as your first . . . and as substantial. Nice strawman ad hominem. I haven't seen anyone here asking for her to do anything for them.

Looks to me like being a long term resident of FR hasn't done much for your reasoning ability or ability to argue your case. Here's a hint, ad hominem attacks rarely count as legitimate arguments in defense of your claims.

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

Palin's experience level is about on a parr with Obama's.

Obama served on a city council, was a Mayor, a state regulator, and a Governor?

[editor-surveyor]

No, its not the old newbie argument; you’ll never be anything but ‘in training’ in any aspect of life, ever.

You’re ill equipped to weigh in on Palin, since you haven’t the personal development to understand where she’s coming from, nor why all the real American Christian patriots recognized her unique suitability to the presidency.

Finally, calling attention to your short comings is not “adhominem” since you are not the subject, and it is necessary expose the facts in order for all to assess your lack of qualifications to address any of the issues, or acceptability as a presenter of evidence.