Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ml/nj; Spaulding
Maybe the two of you can help me. Just what law of the first Congress is being discussed here...
From the text of S. RES. 511
...Whereas such limitations would be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the `natural born Citizen' clause of the Constitution of the United States, as evidenced by the First Congress's own statute defining the term `natural born Citizen';
I'd like to know which law they're talking about and get the text of the law.
I've looked at the Statutes at Large, 1789-1875 and don't find any laws that seem to cover this issue. Perhaps ya'll will help me out here and have better luck.
48 posted on 04/16/2010 7:25:01 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: philman_36; ml/nj; Spaulding; All
Maybe the two of you can help me. Just what law of the first Congress is being discussed here... From the text of S. RES. 511
...Whereas such limitations would be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the `natural born Citizen' clause of the Constitution of the United States, as evidenced by the First Congress's own statute defining the term `natural born Citizen';
I'd like to know which law they're talking about and get the text of the law. I've looked at the Statutes at Large, 1789-1875 and don't find any laws that seem to cover this issue. Perhaps ya'll will help me out here and have better luck.
"

---------------------------------------------------------------

They are refering to the Naturalization Act of 1790, which states (in relavent part):

"that the children of citizens [plural] of the United States that might be born beyond the sea, or out of the limits of the United States, should be considered as natural-born citizens"
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0088_0162_ZO.html

Interestingly, that verbiage is part of the Minor v. Happersett SCOTUS decision from 1875.

That part of the 1790 Act (relevant parts of which, of course, were later repealed by the 1795 Act) sounds a bit like Senator McCain's "situation" (re: Senate non binding resolution 511) doesn't it?

The "first Congress" spanned sessions from March 4, 1789 until March 3, 1791.

127 posted on 04/16/2010 1:49:28 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson