Replies

So I guess you feel we should just wait out his 4 year term
Unfortunately, I do feel that way. The founding fathers gave us the mechanisms to verify a candidate's qualifications
1. Citizens vote for electors and can choose not to vote if a candidate doesn't qualify
2. The state can choose not to allow an elector for an unqualified candidate
3. Congress can refuse to accept electors for an unqualified candidate
4. Supreme Court can refuse to swear in an unqualified candidate
5. The media is free to report on a candidate's qualifications

We may have all failed in this case, but as much as I'd like Obama gone, the remedy at this point is impeachment if the congress decides to do that or electing someone else next time, not repeated lawsuits from citizens/states/soldiers. Lawsuits against a president's policy need to happen any time there is a constitutional question. Lawsuits against a president are a bad precedent IMHO - they are a distraction and impeachment is the way the president should be checked. You may or may not think there is merit to the current lawsuits, but I can certainly see the opportunity for constant meritless cases being brought against a president for the purpose of publicity and/or distraction.

Respecting the constitution is important, but so is respecting the decisions of citizens, states, congress, and the supreme court. Whether you agree with them or not they have made the decision that Obama was qualified. People on both sides claim the constitution is clear on natural-born, but there is uncertainty so I will accept the people's choice even though I strongly disagree with it. I was very unhappy with the left's failure to accept Bush's legitimacy after the people chose and I feel the same about people who deny Obama's legitimacy.