Posted on 04/14/2010 4:33:01 PM PDT by South40
Edited on 04/14/2010 4:47:40 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
That chick is cracked, okay? I’ll bet Charles Manson would throw her out of bed for being too nuts.
I’ll be at the Pleasanton Tea Party tomorrow. I’ve NEVER seen her on the list of invited featured speakers.
http://www.pleasantonteaparty.com/
If shes there Im NOT attending.
I wonder if anyone else has ever been fined for filing frivolous lawsuits. Lawyers continue to file them so I imagine fines are rare.
Good Call.
The author of this story is a liberal who is every bit as wacky as Taitz. It’s quite possible she’s lying.
I’ll be there, too. Check your Freepmail...
wow. isn’t this a little like The Ramones refusing to appear on stage with The Sex Pistols?
Orly Taitz is a Patriot for leading the charge to get rid of the usurper in the white house. Would anyone believe Soetoro after his thousand lies in 15 months, or would you believe the Minister of Lands in Kenya who said the scumbag obama was born in Kenya.
You folks are all wrong. The questions she is asking could not be more basic and to the point.
A constitutional point of law is not a frivolous lawsuit; especially when the language could not be more clear.
Instead, people get intellectually lazy and just emotionally react to half ass headlines ginned up by half wit journalists and editors without bothering to be skeptical readers or find out why.
Yep, good call.
We need to work the states to make them pass statues to qualify for the presidential ticket.
Technically, she was fined $10K for the "frivolous" stuff. Judge Land doubled it when she blew-off his "show cause" order asking why he shouldn't fine her in the first place.
A commie usurper in the white house is frivilous???
No, an incompetent attorney that accuses her judge of secretly meeting with A.G. Holder in a coffee shop across the street from his courthouse to fix the case.
Ding, ding, ding!
I’m sure some folks will be upset about this, but I can see the wisdom behind the decision. Why muddy the waters of the Tea Party idea? It is less about Obama personally, and more about Obama’s and Congressional decisions about spending, in particular, and national economics, in general.
And, we know this isn’t true. . . how?
Because Holder made a public appearance elsewhere, and he would’ve needed George H.W. Bush’s SR-71 to make it to the coffeeshop on time.
Thank you!
The Dems and the libs in the media have been successful in painting anyone who questions Obama's legitimacy as fringe crackpots, racists, or worse.
The first response of his enablers is to attack anyone and everyone who asks even the most simple basic question, such as "Why won't Obama show his birth certificate?"
And now it is sad to see so many on the conservative side doing the libs dirty work for them.
.
Good reason. Sounds delusional to me, unless their are a few look-alikes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.