From the article: But believers waiting to welcome this most prodigal of sons back into the fold were to be disappointed. Flew's conversion did not embrace such concepts as Heaven, good and evil or the afterlife let alone divine intervention in human affairs. His God was strictly minimalist very different from "the monstrous oriental despots of the religions of Christianity and Islam", as he liked to call them. God may have called his creation into existence, then, but why did he bother? To that question, it seemed, Flew had no answer.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antony_Flew#Biography
In December 2004, an interview with Flew conducted by Gary Habermas was published in the journal Philosophia Christi (published by the Evangelical Philosophical Society with the assistance of Biola University), with the title, Atheist Becomes Theist - Exclusive Interview with Former Atheist Antony Flew. Flew agreed to this title. According to the introduction, Flew informed Habermas in January 2004 that he had become a deist, and the interview took place shortly thereafter. Then the text was amended by both participants over the following months prior to publication. In the article Flew states that he has left his long-standing espousal of atheism by endorsing a deism of the sort that Thomas Jefferson advocated (While reason, mainly in the form of arguments to design, assures us that there is a God, there is no room either for any supernatural revelation of that God or for any transactions between that God and individual human beings.). Flew stated that the most impressive arguments for Gods existence are those that are supported by recent scientific discoveries and that the argument to Intelligent Design is enormously stronger than it was when I first met it. He also answered in the affirmative to Habermass question, So of the major theistic arguments, such as the cosmological, teleological, moral, and ontological, the only really impressive ones that you take to be decisive are the scientific forms of teleology?. He supported the idea of an Aristotelian God with the characteristics of power and also intelligence, stating that the evidence for it was stronger than ever before. He rejects the ideas of an afterlife, of God as the source of good (he explicitly states that God has created a lot of evil), and of the resurrection of Jesus as a historical fact though he has allowed a short chapter arguing for Christs resurrection to be added into his latest book.
http://www.biola.edu/antonyflew/page6.cfm#8
Flew is particularly hostile to Islam, and says it is best described in a Marxian way as the uniting and justifying ideology of Arab imperialism. In a December 2004 interview he said: Im thinking of a God very different from the God of the Christian and far and away from the God of Islam, because both are depicted as omnipotent Oriental despots, cosmic Saddam Husseins.
When asked in December 2004 by Duncan Crary of Humanist Network News if he still stood by the argument presented in The Presumption of Atheism, Flew replied he did but he also restated his position as deist: Im quite happy to believe in an inoffensive inactive god. When asked by Crary whether or not he has kept up with the most recent science and theology, he responded with Certainly not, stating that there is simply too much to keep up with. Flew also denied that there was any truth to the rumours of 2001 and 2003 that he had converted to Christianity.
http://www.mail-archive.com/media- href=mailto:dakwah@yahoogroups.com>dakwah@yahoogroups.com/msg01064.html
Recognition of a Higher Power is at least a start.