I disagree. I don’t think she is a loon, she just comes across as one because she doesn’t/didn’t know how to present her case to the courts.I agree with her stance that Zero is not eligible to hold office 100%. She just doesn’t have the evidence needed, however,I have not seen evidence to prove he IS qualified to be POTUS, either. So I don;t think she has been discredited. But, at this point in time,unless new,real evidence is discovered, she ought to lay low, because without more evidence, it is a loser issue for us.
Isn't that the kind of stuff people are supposed to learn in law school?