Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SatinDoll
Corpus Christi both ought to move to less hazardous locations

Huh?

449 posted on 04/14/2010 9:40:35 AM PDT by Eaker (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies ]


To: Eaker

Maybe she meant Galveston.


450 posted on 04/14/2010 10:14:43 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 449 | View Replies ]

To: Eaker

“Huh?”

I believe that New Orleans and Corpus Christi both ought to move to less hazadous locations.

This is just a personal belief. I’ve noticed that in past historical times when a city was devastated, usually by natural disasters like floods, earthquake, or whatever, the inhabitants would move the city to another location.

It has historical precedence. Coastal areas are prone to having shorelines move - oceans actively erode and deposit material haphazardly. Ultimately it is up to those cities to make the decision whether to move or not and if the government, meaning U.S. taxpayers, decided it was ridiculous to keep rebuilding in such locations, perhaps the cities will move.


463 posted on 04/14/2010 1:06:47 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO Foreign Nationals as our President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 449 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson