Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers
“State officials believed that Nancy Pelosi’s affidavit stated that Obama met the qualifications for the office of POTUS. She lied and they believed her lie.” Your evidence? You are accusing Pelosi of a crime. Proof?

Her affidavits to the 50 states.

“Where is this mysterious document attested to by a Hawaiian official??? Post it.” A picture was publicly posted for some time.

Wrong. There is no attestation of any picture on the internet by any Hawaiian official, except in your prefabricating imagination and your lying posts.

“But he’s still a British subject per the British Nationality Act, isn’t he??? Quit prefabricating.” No. And it takes a truly STUPID person to suggest that Obama has any loyalty to the United Kingdom! He HATES the British. By your rationale, everyone born in Kenya prior to their independence is still a loyal subject of the British Crown! Again - STUPID!

But he’s still a British subject per the British Nationality Act, isn’t he???

629 posted on 04/14/2010 7:06:11 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 625 | View Replies ]


To: Uncle Chip

Yes, Pelosi provided an affidavit to 50 states - do you have PROOF she lied on those? Providing affidavits is not a crime...

“There is no attestation of any picture on the internet by any Hawaiian official, except in your prefabricating imagination and your lying posts.”

The official said he had seen the supporting data, and that the certificate issued Obama was accurate. But you toss the word “lie” around like...well, like a LOSER!

“But he’s still a British subject per the British Nationality Act, isn’t he???”

No.

But here is how Putin can conquer the USA:

He declares all US citizens are automatically Russian citizens. Then, effective immediately, NO ONE can be President, because we would all be loyal subjects of Mother Russia. And since there would be no Commander in Chief, there would be no valid military orders.

With no military, Putin can walk in and take over.

I don’t know why Russia didn’t do that during the Cold War! Guess they aren’t BIRTHER LOSERS!


637 posted on 04/14/2010 7:31:04 AM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 629 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson