I don’t get you saying that you think he is “ultimately” (whatever that means...) ineligible but not a fraud.
That would only work if he thought he was eligible but wrong about it. Then why would he hide/scrub/delete every scrap of his past that he possibly could? Only guilty people do that.
He knows whether he is ineligible or not. So therefore, if he is not eligible, he is a fraud.
Can’t have it both ways.
Well, allow me to better explain myself.
Based on my personal research of historical documents, I don’t believe Obama fits the definition of a natural born citizen as intended by our Founding Fathers. (However, IANAL, so if the SCOTUS heard a case on the merits and ruled Obama eligible, I would accept their decision.)
Outside of Obama portraying himself as a natural born citizen, he is not a fraud, IMHO. He has been very up front with the American people about what he planned to do when he because president. So he’s not a fraud in that sense. He’s everything he advertised himself to be: an American-hating, Marxist thug, who doesn’t respect the Constitution, doesn’t think America has gone far enough to distribute social justice, redistribute wealth, etc. etc. etc. He said he wanted to fundamentally change this nation and he has started down that path, has he not?
Make more sense? When I say I don’t think he’s a fraud, I really mean that I think he’s true to his character and advertized intentions.