Replies

“The defense case is not following the orders based on the CIC not being legitmate. “

The defense case is that the member wants to find out if the CINC is legitimate, after many elected officials have certified him.

It doesn’t work that way. Since everyone involved in certifying the election says Obama is eligible and legitimately elected, it will be up to the defendant to show his doubts have validity.

If a killer says God made him do it, it is up to the defendant to show it was really God talking to him. It is not up to the prosecution to show that God wasn’t talking to him...

It is not up to the prosecution to show that God wasn’t talking to him.

Nope. The prosecution needs to prove there isn't a God, so how could he possibly talk to him.

The prosecution has to prove BO's eligibility to prove his NBC status. Then it's a slam dunk, Larkin would be guilty. Isn't it up to the prosecution to find the defendant guilty? Surely, we can't argue that Barry wasn't born, so onto the next step - a step they will NOT attempt.

Because they won't go to the next step, they 'claim' the defendant guilty. They win by default and NOT by proof or TRUTH!